FlyingPress vs WP Rocket Plugins Comparison With CDN

FlyingPress and WP Rocket are Paid cache plugins to speed up your WordPress website’s overall speed. But there are some differences between them. Here is the FlyingPress vs WP Rocket comparison for those who want to consider which one to choose.

Features	FlyingPress	WP Rocket
Price (1 Site)	$60, $42 (Renewal)	$59
Self-host Google fonts	✓	x
Reduce layout shifts	✓	✓
Preload critical images	✓	x
Bypass cookies	✓	x
Unused CSS	3 Options	Inline
Skip rendering elements	✓	x
Setup guidelines	Just enough	Clarified
iFrame Optimizations	Impressive	Requires more
JavaScript Optimizations	Complete optimization	Requires more
Preload the cache without clearing the existing cache	✓	x
CDN	$3 monthly	$9 monthly
Bloat Remover	✓	x

Remember this; upgrade your WebHost before using cache or asset optimization plugins. Because the speed of your web hosting service matters how fast the feature can be performed and how many visitors it can handle. The practical way to improve performance is to replace your old web host with a faster one with enough server resources.

Switching to a host like Cloud/VPS can have multiple advantages if you’re on shared hosting. If your host is super slow, it doesn’t work pushing with just cache plugins.

If you want a free one, try the LiteSpeed cache plugin. It is far ahead in caching and features, with image optimizations, object caching, advanced optimization, and database optimizations. Although the UI is tricky for beginners, plenty of features exist.

Table of Contents

FlyingPress

FlyingPress is a premium cache plugin developed by Gijo Varghese. I don’t want to publish another post for a FlyingPress review. So, here is my full FlyingPress cache plugin review.

You may know Gijo because he specializes in WordPress speed and runs WP Speed Matters, FlyingWeb solutions, many free plugins, Flying Pages, Flying Scripts, and a CDN service for WordPress called FlyingProxy powered by Cloudflare Enterprise.

Most cache plugins have non-speed optimization features, such as removing the metadata, RSS link, Heartbeat control, disabling emojis, and Htaccess features.

But, FlyingPress doesn’t include heavy stuff and does not take technical setup. You can experience it whether you’re a beginner or NOT, even if you don’t recognize what it does.

The layout and user interface are very simple. Absolutely, it seems uncomplicated, but the features are impressive. I like the design, and there isn’t stupid enhancement.

Affiliate Disclaimer: Here is my direct link for FlyingPress. Thanks for your support.

FlyingPress gives me the fastest loading time I’ve ever experienced. I am not concerned with page metrics like PageSpeed or Gtmetrix, but I got a global load time of less than one second with just Cloudflare free. And settled multiple performance problems. I always trust speed with my eyes, and sure, FP gives me flying speed that I can’t even figure out.

Here are some speed Metrix images with FP:

FlyingPress Speed Test with a KeyCDN Tool

FlyingPress Version 4

FlyingPress provides frequent updates, and recently, they oriented introducing version 4. They called it “the rebirth of FlyingPress.” If you’ve been following recent updates, you may have noticed that. V4 completely changed the user interface and specific functions.

What’s changed in the new version?

According to their blog announcement, they changed and removed some features.

Here are some of the differences I’ve noticed.

UI: The interface has changed a lot with the new version. I think it is now more effortless, with no unnecessary stuff.
HTML Process: FlyingPress earlier depended on third-party HTML APIs to process HTML, which took more server resources. They set a custom HTML parser in the latest version with less server resource usage.
Automatic unused CSS removal: In the previous version, you could specify the default critical CSS and use CSS, but in v4, you only need a checkbox to remove unused CSS.
Bloat Settings: growing into an all-in-one optimization plugin, including bloat reduction, but still, they are missing as many functions as perfmatters. But even if you do not utilize any asset optimization plugins on your website, it is still good.
Delay JavaScript: This new and improved feature allows you to delay all JavaScript files for an improved routine. Or you can manually delay scripts like ads, analytics, tags, and other third-party scripts.
Preload cache: You had to preload the cache with clearing in the previous version, but now you can preload the cache without removing the old cache. You can still do it if you want to purge first and preload.
Bypass Cookies: A new feature to ignore cache on custom cookies.

Try FlyingPress‘s new version today and experience it.

My favorite features

I’ve used several cache plugins and various optimization plugins, but this is by far the best plugin I’ve ever used, and here are some of my favorite FlyingPress features.

Basic UI: I love simple UI and hate complex crap, especially plugins like W3 Total Cache, which sucks it in like a maze. However, FlyingPress is clean and cool.
Lazy render elements: Defer rendering features until they are requested.
Delay JavaScript: load javascript when the user interacts. I love how it prevents typically third-party code from downloading till the user enters. You can include external factors like WPDiscuz, Google translate, statistics, and ads. So can reduce dealing with queries from other parties in this way.
Optimize Google Fonts: They are external resources and always have a massive impact on websites. But, FlyingPress’s feature for combining & local host Google Fonts helps to reduce this problem.
Placeholder photo for YouTube: Render multiple resources when you’ve added a YouTube video on your websites, such as an Html code and heavier script. YouTube covers can be replaced with a placeholder, meaning videos only load when someone clicks. How cool!
Exclude the above fold images from the lazy load: If you enable lazy loading for photos, all images will do so. However, pics above the fold shouldn’t be loaded; this feature will decide based on numbers.
Preload critical images: logos, the feature graphic, and other pictures in the above fold should be fetched early for the first display.
Unused CSS: I already mentioned that this feature is part of the new version, which indicates that unused CSS is now automatically removed.

There are multiple extra features, but these stand out as exceptional.

FlyingPress all features

FlyingPress recently modified and changed a lot of things and UI features and sections, and now includes nine zones. Let’s take a look at them one by one in this review.

1. Dashboard

The dashboard has account data and quick steps like cache clearing, preloading, and purging everything. You can create support tickets, join Facebook, and use documents. Also, you can use FlyingPress to manage hosts like Rocket.net, Kinsta, WP Engine, etc.

2. Cache Settings

They include new features in the new version, like removing auto purge and replacing cache lifespan with scheduled preload. And you can use URLs or file paths to exclude pages from caching. The new feature ignores cookies and query parameters.

You can now set a separate cache for mobiles. It is not required for an average site, like a blog. However, if your site creates different content for mobile devices, you can allow it.

Don’t use the “Optimize for logged-in users” setting. If your dashboard is super slow most of the time on hosting, or you do not have enough server resources. It is time to increase your servers or move to a better one. Sometimes it can be due to compatibility issues with some plugins and themes. Also, slow plugins are often the cause of a slow dashboard.

3. CSS Settings

This section includes CSS minifications, unused CSS, and lazy render Html elements. This can fix render blocking and remove unused CSS. Your pages load faster for users. Many plugins generate unnecessary codes. Hence, you should avoid using slow plugins.

This method is especially effective when you have a bunch of stylesheets.

Try it and see whether it improves your site. Leave unused CSS if you have a big website. These methods only sometimes work fine, but I’ve never faced issues with FlyingPress.

4. JavaScript Settings

Like CSS settings, JavaScript settings include minifying, preloading, deferring JavaScript, and, most useful feature, “delay JavaScript,” I mentioned earlier. If you use ad networks, this feature is handy. Javascript defers methods are only sometimes effective.

Not every JS should be delayed. It can help if you don’t need the features of JS that aren’t used for critical tasks. Otherwise, deferring may slow rather than help it. However, third-party scripts should take a long, and the “delay selected” method is the safest option.

5. Font Settings

Font settings include font optimization, combining and hosting Google fonts on your web server, fallback, and preloading. Fonts look little. But that significantly impacts website loading speed, mainly if you use third-party fonts like Google, font-awesome/Adobe.

Fonts are always a vital part of a website’s optimization. Because fonts load from other servers and can’t ensure speed, you can fix font issues with FlyingPress font settings.

Still, using the local host is a better way to optimize your fonts. Many themes include default fonts, which you can use, or you can use local host features with a plugin or manually. The good news is that FlyingPress consists of all font optimizations.

6. Image Settings

This section has image optimization, lazy load, excluding the above from the lazy load, adding missing width and height, preloading critical images, and disabling emoji.

You can’t expect image optimizations like a plugin. Nevertheless, FlyingPress has some valuable features, such as preload/above-fold, that other premium plugins aren’t available.

Image is the core element of every website. But the hard part is images take much longer to download and take up more room in the browser if you set them too big.

In such instances, images significantly impact your website’s load time. Using tiny graphics or functions like scale pictures/compression, you can get fast sites to avoid other plugins or use manually optimized images. You can manually optimize using third-party services like Ezgif. Or use plugins like Shortpixel, Webp media, etc.

7. iFrame Settings

The IFrame is mostly YouTube, and you can see most stuff related to YouTube, including settings lazy load iFrames, using placeholder images for YouTube, and local hosting.

iFrames also include HTML stuff like ads and embedded stuff. This feature is handy if you use YouTube videos on your website. They are loaded on other servers, so they can significantly impact page speed. Yet, this is not a problem with FlyingPress.

8. CDN

This section has minimal stuff like “enable CDN. If you use Cloudflare, there is nothing to do here. But if you use Bunny or KeyCDN, you can configure URLs and files. And you can use FlyingCDN. It seems worthwhile and cheap, and it has images in WebP.

If you don’t want to pay money for a CDN, Cloudflare’s free service is exemplary for small and medium-sized sites. But if you have a large site, you should consider a premium CDN with security features because paid CDNs can help when something happens.

9. Database Settings

FlyingPress includes a few database optimizations. Not too effective if you have a small website. But it is OK with busy websites. If you want more advanced features, try WP-Optimize or Advanced DB Cleaner because many plugins cause problems in your database when added/uninstalled. You can remove each database table from these plugins.

Many cache plugins clean your WP database to a certain level but do not let you delete the statistics of old or existing plugins. Even not display how certain databases are packed.

This can occur when you operate plugins like security or other heavy ones. This is why you should use a database cleaning plugin to disable configurations that add extensively.

10. Bloat Settings

This is a significant update from FlyingPress to become a one-stop optimization plugin for your WordPress website, with some useful features but not as many as Asset CleanUp Pro, Gonzales, or Perfmatters. But it can still be handy if you don’t use any plugins like that.

Remove Or Disable:

Google Fonts: This is not a good option if you use Google Fonts. It’s helpful if you only use system fonts or locally hosted fonts.
XML-RPC: This isn’t a speed feature, but it can help prevent unnecessary requests. Also useful for security reasons.
jQuery Migrate: Don’t mess with it; just let it alone.
RSS feed: a helpful security feature that prevents extra requests.
Block Editor CSS: Don’t use it if you are using Gutenberg. It can break the front end. It may be safe to enhance performance if you only use page builders.
oEmbeds: Helpful in preventing previews from third-party URLs.
WP Cron: Don’t mess with this if you don’t know how to use an external cron job.
Emojis: minimal impact on page speed but can slightly improve some.
Control Heartbeat: Leave it alone.
Control Post Revisions: Avoid if you have a VPS or enough server resources, but selecting a few, like three or five, can be useful.

Conclusion

If you don’t want to mess with your website speed optimization, I recommend FlyingPress because it is easy to use. I use it for all my websites. Unlike Litespeed, FP has fewer features but is very effective with easy optimization features.

And with the v4, many things have been improved, and it now works at incredible speeds. Whatever the size of your website. If you want to keep things simplistic, give it a try.

WP Rocket

WP Rocket is a mature cache plugin that was the first to offer plenty of straightforward caching options. I used WP Rocket before moving to FlyingPress, and while it’s not bad. But FlyingPress grabbed my attention with its superior features and frequent updates.

You won’t use a cache plugin if it is slow and breaks sites. W3TC was the famous cache plugin in those days, but it wasn’t easy to configure. When WP Rocket came along, everything became simple. You turn it on, and it works smoothly. No more wasted time trying to find the proper settings. Rocket isn’t the first simple cache plugin, but the initial plugin was user-friendly. It contained some cool features that others didn’t have.

Yes, it is a past story. Now we have FlyingPress. It’s an entirely beat rocket with all stages. More cache plugins, like Litespeed, come into the contest, and even Litespeed is free.

Most are straight and offer various features that WP Rocket doesn’t. There are still a lot of competitors, but WP Rocket remains a strong community. They’re trying to take parts from others. Rocket is easy to use, but advanced users would like more features.

WP Rocket all features

Affiliates say WP Rocket is the top caching plugin. This is not valid now. There are better ones with more clever features. WPR has several sections that we’re going to explore.

1. Cache Settings

WP Rocket’s page caching, which includes mobile cache, a separate cache for mobile, users cache, and cache lifespan, seems helpful in a few scenarios.

2. File Optimization

File optimization options significantly affect website performance but may differ depending on the webpage. Most websites can benefit from minification. However, blends only sometimes work, especially on large websites, and must be fixed with specific pages.

I’ve experienced that.

The JavaScript delay method defers user engagement, such as browsing or pressing, before fetching JavaScript. However, if you put ads on your website, it might need to be improved, as FlyingPress does. But this can significantly boost website speed.

You shouldn’t do it if you have problems combining CSS and JS.

3. Media optimizations

Although WP Rocket provides some media optimizations, it still needs to include features like lazily loading background images and preloading critical images.

Compared to FlyingPress, WP Rocket lacks core media optimization features, such as local YouTube placeholders. Preload critical images and exclude the images above the fold from the lazy load. But you can put image URLs to avoid those from the lazy load.

4. Preload settings

This section contains preload links, prefetch DNS, preload fonts, sitemap preloading, and a few more, particularly fonts. Preload is effective for increasing overall speed.

5. Rules

Most websites do not require advanced rules, and they have little impact on page speed. Examples include never caching URLs, cookies, cache user agents, always purging URLs, and cache query strings. Most of these are only helpful for specific purposes.

6. Database

WP Rocket, like all plugins, has a database cleanup section. But unlike WP-optimize or Advanced DB cleaner, it does not allow you to analyze your overall database tables.

Database optimization has little impact on website speed and is only helpful for large and busy websites. Don’t do things unless you realize how they will affect your website.

7. CDN Configuration

Many cache plugins include CDN configuration. You can configure your CDN and set it up as you wish. Just leave it if you use Cloudflare because they serve at the DNS level.

8. Heartbeat Control

WordPress Heartbeat isn’t much for speed optimization, but WP Rocket has it. You can be disabled/limited in some areas to save resource usage. You can disable heartbeat on some pages, but not all, and it can also break stuff. The safe option is to set a limit.

9. Addons

WP Rocket includes a few Add-Ons, such as Varnish (which should only be enabled if your server does use it), WebP Compatibility, Cloudflare, and Sucuri.

Conclusion

All WP Rocket features are helpful but have not improved in recent years. Rocket’s optimization can impact website performance and vital web factors. However, they might vary based on the website. Comparing them makes it easy to see why FlyingPress is more appropriate. WP Rocket still has a considerable community that they are trying to keep.

WP Rocket vs FlyingPress: Price Comparison

The cost is always a matter. Rocket has 3 choices, while FlyingPress has 4. Rocket does not offer a low renewal price and provides fixed pricing for all terms. FlyingPress has a cheaper renewal cost. Both are fun to use, but are they worth the premium price?

WP Rocket and FlyingPress Price Comparison

Level	FlyingPress	WP Rocket
Single	$ 60/year ($42 on renewal)	$ 59/year
Developers	$ 150/year (5 websites)	$ 99/year (3 sites)
Professional	$ 250/year (50 sites)
Agency	$ 500/year (500 sites)
Unlimited		$249/year

Sure, there are some differences. Several pro cache plugins have unlimited options. WP Rocket provides an unlimited plan because it has been a mature plugin for a long time.

There isn’t an unlimited option with FlyingPress. It is still growing, has a medium community, and launched nearly three years ago, which is why unlimited plans are too risky. But the agency’s plan can be used on 500 sites. It looks the same as the unlimited plan. The good news is that FlyingPress offers a 14-day money-back guarantee. You can ask for a refund if you are unsatisfied or have a problem that can’t be cleared up.

WP Rocket and FlyingPress Alternatives

There are some alternatives to FlyingPress and WP Rocket.

The best one is LiteSpeed Cache, which has many features, enterprise performance, and reliability. Its only limitation is that it requires LiteSpeed servers to use its caching. Another advantage is that it is an entirely free plugin. Booyah! LiteSpeed cache is regularly updated, and the developers aggressively address issues and troubles ASAP.

They focus on keeping their users updated on all vital matters. Any errors detected are usually fixed quickly. Another significant advantage of using LSC is that they provide server-side caching, which means they use the server to create cache webpages.

LC includes security features like security plugins. FlyingPress/Rocket cached pages using file-based/PHP, but LSC uses its servers technologies that are extremely fast.

NitroPack is a premium alternative that combines with cloud caching. It speeds up sites and leads to improve page speed, along with others. I would like it to be affordable; a superior web host is more cost-effective than NitroPack. It is ideal for anyone who uses a poor web host without knowledge of this stuff and can spend a lot of money.

Swift performance is also a good alternative for advanced users. Unlike Rocket and FlyingPress, Swift is not easy to navigate, and you can easily mess up. But if you know what you’re doing, Swift works fine, and the free version fits most sites. But the pro version is superior if you have a high-traffic or large website, like an online store.

FlyingCDN Vs RocketCDN

Both cache plugins offer CDN services. WP Rocket is serving RocketCDN, and FlyingPress is serving FlyingCDN. FlyingCDN, which uses BunnyCDN, is less expensive than Bunny but includes perma-cache, Bunny Optimizer, and other features. That’s great because Bunny requires a higher cost to use those features, whereas FlyingCDN starts at $3 monthly.

	FlyingCDN	RocketCDN
Provider	BunnyCDN	StackPath
Price	$3	$ 9
Edge locations	110+	70+
Latency	26-35ms worldwide	50+ms
SEO headers	✓	x
HTTP3	x	x
Free SSL	✓	✓
DDoS protection	✓	x
Minify CSS and JS	✓	x
Geo replication	✓	x
Image Optimization	✓	x
WebP+Adaptive images	✓	x
Access all POPs	✓	x

RocketCDN uses StackPath. According to its network page, it has a lower data transmission rate and lower PoPs than others. RocketCDN has more flawed than Bunny as it is simply a CDN with no refined features like geo-replication & enhancement.

Rocket makes the network effortless, but that doesn’t mean it’s perfect. There are far superior reasonable alternatives. And the cost is nearly $9 per month. You can use Bunny or FlyingCDN for a much lower price. Alternatively, you can use Cloudflare for free.

Winner

FlyingCDN is the clear winner, with more features and low pricing starting at $3 per month. The monthly cost of Rockt is $9, and it lacks any additional features.

Conclusion

In this comparison (WP Rocket vs. FlyingPress), you can see that FlyingPress is the winner. It is a cutting-edge solution for speed for humans and metrics like Core Web Vital. It is constantly updated and adds new features, which WP Rockett lacks.

Both plugins improve GTMetrix, Pingdom, and Web Vital + Google page speed scores. However, keep in mind that metrics are less important than user experience.

UX is always more important than machines, so always optimize for human eyes. FlyingPress is crafted for humans, so you can get an accelerated website with just a few clicks. It isn’t advanced but has a modern interface with enough smart features.

WP Rocket still has enough features and is steadfast but has fewer features than the others. The UI is well-designed and clear. I’m not too fond of it simply because it is boring and hasn’t developed certain features. It seems to be a dump plugin now. The biggest reason people avoid it is that it’s expensive and lacks innovative features like image optimization. Its simplicity may be a plus based on the user’s preferences.

I’m not going to criticize WP Rocket. FlyingPress has a user-friendly interface that includes all the essential functions. If you currently use WP Rocket, you should switch to FlyingPress. It has related super caching features with a better user experience.

I always look for ways to improve my guides and welcome your feedback.

Or else, if you enjoyed anything, feel free to share!

Additional readings:

FlyingPress Vs. WP Rocket Cache Plugins Comparison With CDN