FlyingPress and WP Rocket are premium cache plugins to accelerate your website’s overall speed. However, there are some differences between both. Here is my comparison for those who want to consider which one to pick next.
Improving your WebHost before using cache/asset optimization plugins. The speed of your hosting concerns how fast the feature can be performed and how many visitors it can handle. The practical way to improve performance is to replace your old host with a faster one with enough server resources.
If you want a free one, try the LiteSpeed cache plugin. It is far ahead in features, with image optimizations, object caching, advanced optimization, and database optimizations. But the UI is not easy for beginners, but the features are rich.
Let’s explore the inside and differences between these two plugins.
Affiliate Disclaimer: Here is my direct link for FlyingPress, and I value your support.
FlyingPress is a premium cache plugin devoloped by one-man (Gijo Varghese). You may know him because he specializes in Wp speed and runs WP Speed Matters, FlyingWeb solutions, and many free plugins(Flying Pages, Flying Scripts, etc.) and tools. Also, his other project is the FlyingProxy, powered by Cloudflare Enterprise.
Most cache plugins contain non-speed optimization features, such as removing the metadata, RSS link, Heartbeat control, disabling emojis, and Htaccess features.
But, FlyingPress does not include heavy stuff and does not take technical configuration. You can experience it whether you’re a beginner or NOT, even if you don’t recognize what it does. The layout and UI look simple, Indeed, it seems easy, but the features are outstanding. I like the design, and there isn’t stupid enhancement.
My favorite features
I’ve used several cache plugins and various optimization plugins, but this is by far the best plugin I’ve ever used, and here are some of my favorite FlyingPress features.
- Basic UI: I love simple UI stuff and hate complex crap, especially plugins like W3 Total Cache, which sucks it in like a maze. However, FlyingPress is clean and cool.
- Lazy render elements: lazy load areas of slow page content, I’ll explain later.
- Enhance Google Fonts: Because they are external resources, they always have a massive impact on websites. But, FlyingPress’s feature for combining & local host Google Fonts helps to reduce this problem.
- Locally host YouTube placeholder: when you activate this, it will be replaced with the thumbnail from the Youtube clip. FlyingPress will download and store the image to the placeholder. It is outstanding. You can’t find it in other cache plugins.
- Exclude the above fold pictures from the lazy load: If we enable lazy loading for images, all images will do so. However, pics above the fold shouldn’t be loaded in lazy mode; this feature will do so based on numbers.
- Preload critical pics: logos, the feature graphic, and other pictures in the above fold should be fetched early for the first display.
There are multiple extra features, but these stand out as exceptional.
FlyingPress all features
FlyingPress has 8 sections; let’s look at them.
In the cache section, you can see cache pages, auto purge, lifespan, excluding pages from caching, ignoring query strings, and improving for logged-in users.
Don’t use the “Optimize for logged-in users” setting. Because if your dashboard is super slow most of the time on hosting or you do not have enough server resources, it is time to increase your servers or move to a better one.
This section has CSS minifications, critical CSS, lazy render Html elements, etc.
Critical CSS can fix render blocking and remove unused CSS. Your page appears to load faster for users. However, it may damage the design of your site.
This method is especially effective when you have a bunch of stylesheets. Test it and see whether it improves your site. Leave it alone if you have a large website.
This section includes font optimization, which provides for locally host GF and merging, fallback and preload. Yeah, the fonts look like small stuff. But that significantly impacts website loading speed, especially if you use third-party fonts like Google/font-awesome/Adobe.
This section is important to me. Fonts are always an essential part of a website’s optimization. Because fonts load from other servers, we cannot guarantee their speed.
This section includes some image optimization stuff like lazy load, excluding above the top, excluding from the lazy load, add responsively. Also, have attributes for width and height, disable emoji, and preload critical images.
You can’t expect image optimization like a plugin. However, it has some valuable features, such as preload/above-fold, that other premium plugins are missing.
Image is the core element of every website. But the hard part is images take much longer to download and take up more room in the browser if you set them too big. In such instances, pictures significantly impact how quickly your website loads.
Using tiny graphics or processes like scale pictures and compression, you can get fast websites to avoid using other plugins or use images that are always manually optimized. You can manually optimize using third-party services like Ezgif.
The IFrame is mostly YouTube, and you can see most stuff related to YouTube, including settings lazy load iFrames, using placeholder images for YouTube, and local host YouTube placeholders as thumbnails. That feature is excellent. But iFrames also include HTML stuff like ads and embedded effects.
This section has minimal stuff like Enable CDN/paid addon (FlyingCDN). But FlyingCDN seems valuable and cheap, as it includes images in WebP. If you use Cloudflare, nothing to do here. But if you use Bunny/KeyCDN, you can configure URLs/files.
If you don’t want to pay money for a CDN, Cloudflare’s free version is fine for small/medium-sized sites. But if you have a large site, you should consider a premium CDN with security features because paid CDNs can help when something happens.
FlyingPress plugin, like others, includes a few database optimization options. Not too effective if you have a small website. But it is OK with busy websites.
However, if you want more advanced features, try WP-Optimize or Advanced Database Cleaner because many plugins cause problems in your database when added/uninstalled. You can remove each database from those plugins.
If you don’t want to mess with your website speed optimization, I recommend FlyingPress because it is easy to use. I use it for all my websites. FP does not have many features like Litespeed, but it is very effective with simple optimization features.
Doesn’t matter your website size. Give it a shot if you want to keep things simple.
WP Rocket is a mature cache plugin that was the first to offer plenty of straightforward caching options. I used WP Rocket before moving to FlyingPress, and while it’s not bad, FlyingPress caught my attention with its superior features.
You won’t use a cache plugin if it is slow and breaks websites.
In the days, W3TC was the famous cache plugin, but very difficult to configure. When WP Rocket came, everything became simple. You turn it on, and it works smoothly. No more misspent time trying to find the proper settings. WP Rocket isn’t the first to make a cache plugin simple, but the initial cache plugin was user-friendly.
Yes, it is a past story, and now we have FlyingPress, which is an entirely beat rocket with all settings. A few more cache plugins, like Litespeed cache, have come into the competition, and even it is free. Most are straightforward and offer various features that WP Rocket does not.
There are still a lot of rivals now, but while WP Rocket remains a strong community, they’re trying to take features from those around them. Although WP Rocket is easy to use, advanced users would like more specific features.
WP Rocket all features
Many affiliates say WP Rocket is the top caching plugin. This is not valid now; there are other better alternatives with more new clever features.
WP Rocket has several sections that we’re going to explore.
1. Cache Settings
WP Rocket’s page caching, which includes mobile cache, a separate cache for mobile, users cache, and cache lifespan, seems helpful in a few scenarios.
2. File Optimization
File optimization options significantly affect website performance, but they may differ depending on the webpage. Most websites can benefit from minification; however, combinations only sometimes work, particularly on large-sized websites, and might need fixing with specific pages.
That has happened to me.
If you got problems combining CSS /JS, you shouldn’t do it.
3. Media optimizations
Although WP Rocket provides some media optimizations, it still needs to include features like lazily loading background images and preloading critical images.
Compared to FlyingPress, WP Rocket lacks core media optimization features, such as the option to store YouTube placeholders locally. Preload critical images and exclude the images above the fold from the lazy load. But you can put image URLs if you want to avoid those from the lazy load.
4. Preload settings
This section contains preload links, prefetch DNS, preload fonts, sitemap preloading, and a few more, particularly fonts. Preload is effective for increasing overall speed.
Most websites do not require advanced rules, and they have little impact on page speed. Examples include never caching URLs, cookies, cache user agents, always purging URLs, and cache query strings. Only useful for specific purposes.
WP Rocket, like all plugins, has a database cleanup section. But unlike WPO/ADC, it does not allow you to study your overall database tables. Database optimization has little impact on website speed and is only helpful for large and busy websites. Don’t do things unless you realize how they will impact your site.
7. CDN Configuration
All cache plugins are included in this section. This is where you can configure your CDN. Just leave it if you use Cloudflare.
8. Heartbeat Control
Heartbeat isn’t much for speed optimization, but WP Rocket has it. You can be disabled/limited in some areas to save resource usage. You can disable heartbeat on some pages, but not all, and it can also break stuff. The safe option is to set a limit.
WP Rocket includes a few Add-Ons, such as Varnish (which should only be enabled if your server does use it), WebP Compatibility, Cloudflare, and Sucuri.
All WP Rocket features are helpful but have not improved in recent years. Rocket’s optimization can impact website performance/vital web factors. However, they might vary based on the website. Comparing them makes it easy to see why FlyingPress is better. Rocket still has a large fan base, which they are trying to keep.
The cost is always a matter. Rocket has 3 choices, while FlyingPress has 4. Rocket does not offer a low renewal price and provides fixed pricing for all terms. FlyingPress has a cheaper renewal cost. Both are fun to use, but are they worth the premium price?
|1 Website||$ 60/year ($42 on renewal)||$ 49/year|
|To Developers||$ 150/year (5 websites)||$ 99/year (3 sites)|
|Professional||$ 250/year (50 sites)|
|Agency||$ 500/year (500 sites)|
Sure, there are some differences.
Several pro cache plugins have open-plan options. WP Rocket provides an unlimited plan because it is a mature plugin that has existed for a long time.
There isn’t an unlimited option from FlyingPress.
FP is still growing and has no high following and launched nearly two years, which may be why unlimited plans are too risky. But Agency’s kit can use on almost 500 websites. Look like the same as the complete option to unlimited plans.
The good news is that FlyingPress offers a 14-day money-back guarantee. If you are unsatisfied with your buy or have a problem that can’t be cleared up, you can ask for a refund.
WP Rocket/FlyingPress Alternatives
There are some alternatives to FlyingPress and WP Rocket.
But the best one is LiteSpeed Cache, which has many features, enterprise performance, and reliability. Its only limitation is that it requires a LiteSpeed server to use its caching controls. Another advantage is that it is an entirely free plugin, Booyah!
LiteSpeed cache is regularly updated, and the dev aggressively addresses issues and troubles ASAP. Focuses on keeping their server users updated, so they stay caught up on all vital matters. Any errors detected are usually fixed quickly.
Another significant advantage of using LSC is that they provide server-side caching, which means they use the server to create cache webpages. FlyingPress/WP Rocket cached pages using file-based otherwise PHP, but LSC uses its own servers technologies that are extremely fast.
NitroPack is a premium alternative that combines with their cloud caching.
NitroPack quickly speeds up websites with little effort and leads to improve page speed, along with other help. I wouldn’t like it because too expensive; a superior web host is more cost-effective than NitroPack. It is ideal for anyone who uses a poor web host without knowledge about this stuff and can spend a lot of money.
Swift performance is also an excellent alternative for advanced users.
Unlike WP Rocket/FlyingPress, Swift UI is not easy to navigate, and you can easily mess up its settings. But if you know what you’re doing, Swift works fine, and the free version is suitable for most websites. However, the pro version is far superior if you have a high-traffic or large website like an online store.
FlyingCDN Vs. RocketCDN
Rocket/FlyingPress offers CDN services called RocketCDN and FlyingCDN.
Related: KeyCDN Review.
FlyingCDN, which uses Bunny, is less expensive than BunnyCDN but includes perma-cache/Bunny Optimizer. That’s great because Bunny requires more funds to use those, whereas FlyingCDN starts at just $3 monthly. It has features such as 70+ POP, geo-replication, image compression/WebP, adaptive images, minification, and more.
RocketCDN uses StackPath. According to its network page, it has a lower data transmission rate and lower PoPs than others. RocketCDN has more flawed than Bunny as it is simply a CDN with no refined features like geo-replication & enhancement.
Rocket makes the network effortless, but that doesn’t mean it’s perfect. There are far superior reasonable alternatives. And the cost is nearly $9 per month; you can use Bunny or FCDN for a much lower price. Alternatively, you can use Cloudflare for free.
FlyingCDN is the clear winner, with more features and low pricing starting at $3 per month. The monthly cost of Rockt is $9, and it lacks any additional features.
In this comparison (WP Rocket vs. FlyingPress), you can see FlyingPress is the clear winner.
FP is a modern solution to boost the website speed for humans and metrics like Core Web Vital. All plugins improve GTMetrix, Pingdom, and Web Vital + google page speed scores. However, keep in mind that metrics are less important than user experience.
UX is always more important than machines, so always optimize for human eyes. FlyingPress is crafted for humans, so you can get an accelerated website with just a few clicks. It is not advanced; it is purely a modern user interface.
WP Rocket still has enough features and is steadfast. But it has fewer features than the other plugins. The UI is very well-designed and straightforward. I’m not too fond of it simply because it is boring and hasn’t developed certain features.
It seems to be a dump plugin now.
The biggest reason avoids it is it’s expensive and lacks clever features like image optimization. Its simplicity may be a plus based on the user’s preferences.
I’m not going to criticize WP Rocket. FlyingPress has a more user-friendly interface that includes all the necessary functions. If you enjoy WP Rocket, you should use FlyingPress. It has related super caching features with a better user experience. However, there is no 100% perfect caching plugin.
I always seek ways to improve my guides and welcome any feedback from you. Or else, if you enjoyed anything, feel free to share!